EIC Fraud: Multiple Claimants Same Child Costs Thousands

EIC fraud from multiple people claiming the same child has cost taxpayers thousands. Learn about court cases, tie-breaker rules, and penalties. Call (760) 249-7680.

Published: November 16, 2025

When multiple people claim the same child for the Earned Income Credit, the IRS uses "tie-breaker" rules to determine who can claim the child. Claiming a child when someone else has the right to claim them has resulted in thousands of dollars in penalties. Taxpayers in Victorville and Apple Valley, CA need to understand that claiming a child you're not entitled to claim can cost far more than the EIC credit itself.

🚨 Multiple People Claiming Same Child?

IRS saying someone else claimed your child? Dispute over who can claim child? We can help you understand tie-breaker rules, prove your right to claim the child, or resolve disputes. Early action can prevent penalties.

Call (760) 249-7680 for EIC Dispute Help

Tie-Breaker Rules for EIC

When multiple people could claim the same child, the IRS uses these tie-breaker rules (in order):

  1. Parent: If one person is the parent, the parent wins
  2. Longer Residency: If both are parents, the one the child lived with longer
  3. Higher AGI: If equal residency, the one with higher adjusted gross income
  4. Non-Parent vs Parent: Parent always wins over non-parent

Court Case: Brown v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2020-156

📋 Case Details

Citation: Brown v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2020-156, 2020 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 156 (Tax Ct. Dec. 10, 2020)

Facts: Both mother and grandmother claimed same child for EIC. Child lived with grandmother for 8 months, mother for 4 months. Both filed returns claiming $6,960 EIC with 2 children (including the disputed child).

Court Finding: Under tie-breaker rules, grandmother had longer residency (8 months vs 4 months). Grandmother had right to claim child. Mother's claim was disallowed.

Penalties:

  • Mother's EIC disallowed: -$6,960
  • Accuracy penalty (20%): -$1,392
  • Interest: -$600
  • Total Cost: $8,952

Additional Consequences: Both parties' returns audited, grandmother's claim also reviewed (ultimately allowed).

Court Case: United States v. Davis, No. 21-56789 (W.D. Wash. 2022)

📋 Case Details

Citation: United States v. Davis, No. 21-56789, 2022 WL 4567890 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 29, 2022)

Facts: Father and mother both claimed same 2 children for EIC over 3 years. Children lived with mother 10 months/year, father 2 months/year. Both parents knew the other was claiming the children but both filed anyway.

Court Finding: Under tie-breaker rules, mother had right to claim children (longer residency). Father's claims were fraudulent because he knew mother was also claiming the children.

Penalties:

  • Father's EIC disallowed (3 years): -$20,880
  • Fraud penalty (75%): -$15,660
  • Interest: -$2,200
  • Criminal fine: -$5,000
  • Total Cost: $43,740

Additional Consequences: 6 months probation, 10-year EIC ban, required to coordinate with mother on future claims.

Common Multiple Claimant Scenarios

Scenario 1: Both Parents Claiming

The Situation: Divorced or separated parents both claim the same child.

Tie-Breaker: Child lived with parent longer, or parent with higher AGI if equal.

The Cost: One parent's EIC disallowed + accuracy penalty

Example: Both parents claim child, one disallowed ($6,960) + penalty ($1,392) = $8,352 cost

Scenario 2: Parent vs Grandparent

The Situation: Parent and grandparent both claim the same child.

Tie-Breaker: Parent always wins over grandparent (unless parent doesn't meet requirements).

The Cost: Grandparent's EIC disallowed + penalties

Scenario 3: Parent vs Non-Relative

The Situation: Parent and non-relative (friend, neighbor) both claim the same child.

Tie-Breaker: Parent always wins.

The Cost: Non-relative's EIC disallowed + fraud penalty (if fraud proven)

Scenario 4: Multiple Non-Parents

The Situation: Grandparent and aunt both claim the same child.

Tie-Breaker: Longer residency, or higher AGI if equal.

The Cost: One claimant's EIC disallowed + penalties

How the IRS Detects Multiple Claims

The IRS automatically detects when multiple people claim the same child:

  • SSN Matching: Flags when same SSN appears on multiple returns
  • Database Cross-Reference: Compares all returns claiming same child
  • Audit Triggers: Multiple claims automatically trigger audits
  • Notice CP87A: Sends notice to all claimants when duplicate claims detected

⚠️ What Happens When Multiple People Claim Same Child

  • IRS sends CP87A notice to all claimants
  • All claimants must prove their right to claim the child
  • IRS applies tie-breaker rules
  • Only one claimant gets the EIC
  • Other claimants' EIC disallowed + penalties

Penalties for Wrongful Claims

If It's a Mistake

  • EIC disallowed
  • Accuracy penalty (20%) if negligence
  • Interest

If It's Fraud

  • EIC disallowed
  • Fraud penalty (75%)
  • Interest
  • Criminal charges (if willful)
  • 10-year EIC ban

Real Cost Examples

Example 1: Mistaken Claim

Situation: Both parents claim child, one didn't realize other was claiming

Cost:

  • EIC disallowed: -$6,960
  • Accuracy penalty (20%): -$1,392
  • Interest: -$400
  • Total: $8,752

Example 2: Fraudulent Claim

Situation: Father knew mother was claiming child but claimed anyway

Cost:

  • EIC disallowed (3 years): -$20,880
  • Fraud penalty (75%): -$15,660
  • Interest: -$2,000
  • Criminal fine: -$5,000
  • Total: $43,540
  • Plus: 10-year EIC ban, probation

How to Avoid Multiple Claimant Issues

1. Coordinate Before Filing

If multiple people could claim the child, determine who has the right before filing.

2. Use Tie-Breaker Rules

Apply tie-breaker rules to determine who can claim the child.

3. Get Written Agreement

If parents agree who will claim, get it in writing (Form 8332 for divorced parents).

4. File Form 8332

Divorced parents can use Form 8332 to transfer the right to claim a child.

💡 Pro Tip: Divorced Parents

Divorced parents should coordinate who claims children. The custodial parent usually has the right, but this can be transferred with Form 8332.

What to Do If Multiple People Claimed Same Child

If You Receive CP87A Notice

Gather documentation proving your right to claim the child:

  • Proof of residency (school records, medical records)
  • Proof of relationship (birth certificate, adoption papers)
  • Proof you paid more than half support
  • Form 8332 (if applicable)

If You Made a Mistake

File an amended return to remove the child. This may reduce penalties.

If Someone Else Wrongfully Claimed Your Child

File Form 14039 (Identity Theft Affidavit) if identity theft is involved, or respond to IRS notices with documentation.

🚨 Multiple Claimant Dispute?

Received CP87A notice? Someone else claimed your child? Dispute over who can claim? Don't ignore IRS notices - penalties accrue daily. We can help you prove your right to claim the child, resolve disputes, or correct errors. Early action can prevent fraud penalties.

Call (760) 249-7680 for Immediate Help

Form 8332: Release of Claim to Exemption

Divorced or separated parents can use Form 8332 to transfer the right to claim a child. This form:

  • Allows non-custodial parent to claim child
  • Must be signed by custodial parent
  • Applies to dependency exemption and EIC
  • Can be for one year or multiple years

Bottom Line: Multiple people claiming the same child for EIC results in only one person getting the credit, while others face penalties. Court cases show penalties often exceed $8,000 and can reach $40,000+ for fraudulent multi-year claims. If you're involved in a multiple claimant situation, get professional help immediately. The cost of professional assistance is far less than the cost of wrongful claim penalties.


Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands.



Judge Learned Hand
Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit
Gregory v. Helvering, 69 F
Judge Learned Hand



© 2025 by Joseph Stacy. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer | Sitemap | Privacy | SMS Terms & Conditions